Strontium for osteoporosis…if you’ve never heard of it, you will.
September 14, 2011 at 4:45 pm 40 comments
I understand your time is valuable. If you just have a minute, you can read the conclusion at the end.
First, understand this…
We can’t talk about strontium without first talking about osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is the thinning and weakening of bone tissue. It seems everywhere you turn, you hear something about the rampant increase in cases of osteoporosis. In my (and many others) opinion, the drug companies that make the expensive (and harmful) drugs to treat osteoporosis have created guidelines for determining risk for the illness (through studies funding) that puts a huge percentage of women and men in the “diseased” or “high risk” category. Doctors use one test, the bone density test, to determine if you need treatment even though there are many factors that determine if you are at risk for the disease like your history of smoking, alcohol, and steroid intake, family history and more.
Today, 5 million Americans are following their doctor’s orders, (orders that are based on guidelines funded by the drug companies), and filling these medicines. (My 85 year old Mom’s doctor actually told her she would “die soon from a hip fracture” if she didn’t take these drugs.)

You can read all the FDA warning letters to the osteoporosis drug companies here.
Realize, these drug companies are encouraging doctors to prescribe these drugs… with side effects like jaw bone death, bone cancer, and “unusual fractures”… to people who are just at risk for the disease as well as those who actually have it. Just this week (9/12/11) the FDA convened a special meeting because of the reports of harmful longterm effects for these drugs. The drug companies admit they don’t have long term safety studies because “…long term use wasn’t an issue. We treated sicker women in their 70′s and 80′s”. This is a quote from Dr Paul Miller, a representative with mega drug company Warner Chilcott, maker of Actonel. He’s basically saying “we didn’t care what happened to these women longterm because, let’s face it, how much longer were they gonna live anyway.”
But now that men and women in their 40′s and 50′s are being told to take it for prevention, that may pose a problem for the drug companies….and for patients.
Today, in the USA, there are no alternatives for people who want to take a natural treatment instead of drugs to prevent or reverse osteoporosis. Strontium may provide that alternative.
What is strontium?
We ingest strontium every day as it is all around us in the enviornment. The strontium we ingest goes directly to our bones and is found there along with calcium and phosphorus. Interestingly, the body’s ability to absorb strontium decreases with age. A 1 year old can absorb 60% while a most adults only absorb 30%.
Strontium is also a chemical that occurs in nature and is usually found in naturally formed minerals. It has a chemical composition much like calcium. For those of you who are science geeks, strontium’s symbol is Sr and its atomic number is 38 (but you already knew that, didn’t you).
All elements in nature can have a radioactive form, and strontium is no exception. Strontium has been used for years in its radioactive form to treat bone cancer. Strontium has many other forms. If you Google “strontium” you may find it listed for bone cancer treatment, used in electronics, and used for the color red you see in fireworks.
Just like any other element or chemical, when combined with other elements, different compounds can be made with very different properties. For example, let’s take sodium: sodium chloride is table salt and sodium fluoride is a harmful by-product of aluminum production. Both start with the element sodium, but they end up being very different end products.
This is also the case with strontium.
Right now, in Europe, you can get a prescription for strontium ranelate (brand name: Protelos) to treat, and actually reverse, your osteoporosis. The “ranelate” part is a synthetic chemical that when joined with strontium forms a stable compound for human ingestion. The makers of the “drug” combined natural strontium with a man-made compound for one reason: patent rights. Vitamins and minerals that occur in nature cannot be patented. The cost for strontium ranelate is the same as for the expensive pills and injections we have now in the US for osteoporosis (fosamax, forteo, boniva, actonel, etc) But is this the only way you can get strontium? No.
Strontium has other forms. Mainly, strontium citrate and strontium carbonate. (sound familiar? Your two choices for calcium supplements are calcium citrate and calcium carbonate. Remember, that strontium and calcium are very similar elements) These are “natural” and can be purchased in the US as vitamin supplements. The normal daily dose to treat osteoporosis is 680mg/daily.
Does it work?
In a word: hell yeah. (ok two words)
Obviously, strontium in the form of strontium ranelate has been studied extensively and has shown to markedly improve the bone density tests. Studies show a 31% (yes, that’s thirty-one) reduction in bone fractures compared to a 1% loss in the control group that took a placebo and up to a 14% increase in bone density. Longterm (8 years) studies confirm that there is continued benefit with longterm use even among older women (over 80 yeas old).
It was recently mentioned in Mayo Clinics newsletter as an emerging treatment for osteoporosis. The newsletter stated strontium acts in a way that no other current treatment does with very little side effects. (the Mayo Clinic actually looked at strontium for use in treating osteoporosis in 1959 and found favorable results) Dr Weil has also commented on it.
There is recent hard evidence that shows a comparison of current drug therapy (bisphophonates) with strontium ranelate. The study shows “a notable increase in bone volume fraction after one year of SR (strontium ranelate) treatment compared to the bisphosphonate treatment period.”
Currently strontium ranelate is well tolerated, although there are some minor side effects of gastric upset. (I think I’ll take that over jaw bone death any day!)
If you live in Europe you can get strontium ranelate as a prescription from a medical professional. It is given in doses of 2 g/day.
If you live in the US, you can get other forms of strontium: Strontium citrate and strontium carbonate.
Again, because strontium citrate and carbonate are natural supplements, drug companies do not want to spend money on research for them. There is, however some interesting research on animals that show some promising results. One looked at strontium citrate as used on zebra fish, which have very similar bone make up to that of humans. The fish that took the highest does of strontium citrate had significant increases in bone density and bone growth.
OK, you say, I’m not a fish.
There are ongoing studies to look at strontium citrate use and effectiveness in humans. The results should be out very shortly.
Strontium citrate seems to be better tolerated than strontium carbonate. It must be taken on an empty stomach and far away from calcium intake as the calcium will win the fight for absorption.
What can I do now?
If you are trying to prevent osteoporosis there are many things you can do:
- take calcium according to the recommended dose for your age and sex (usually for adults its 1000-1200 mg /day) take it away from other meds and food. Recent studies suggest you should take you daily dose divided into 4x/day doses to prevent the spikes in your blood calcium and subsequent negative effects
- take vitamin D to aid calcium absorption
- quit smoking
- reduce alcohol intake
- regular weight bearing exercise (walking, running, jumping rope, aerobics)
Conclusion:
- osteoporosis is a weakening of the bones and affects millions of people worldwide
- for severe cases, doctors only had drugs (like boniva, fosamax etc) to prescribe that have many harmful side effects
- there is a new “drug” made from a natural chemical called strontium
- strontium ranelate is currently used in Europe and many other countries with very strong evidence of reversing osteoporosis with very little side effects. Its effects are better than that of the current drug therapy.
- strontium citrate and strontium carbonate are available in the US, but there are no studies yet (although there are studies being done) to determine dose and effectiveness of those forms.
In the meantime, it is your choice to try the strontium preparations available now as a supplement. Normal dose of strontium supplements are 680mg or less/day. Please experiment responsibly and conduct your own research.This post is not meant to diagnose or treat any illness. If you choose to take a strontium supplement, it is your choice.* it is estimated that about half of the bone density reading in people being treated with strontium ranelate is caused by the “reflection” of the compound in the bone. These studies were also validated using a bone biopsy, where a needle is inserted into the bone and some of the bone is actually removed for examination. This is expressed as a percentage of bone surface. The strontium subjects showed 2.94% increase while the bisphosphonate subjects showed 0.2% increase.Addendum: After my doctors blessing, I have chosen to start to take Strontium citrate. The normal dose is 2 capsules/day, but I am starting with one…if I can tolerate it I will go to 2. There is some minor stomach upset, but nothing terrible. I will keep you posted on progress and post the comparison of my bone density studies when I have the next one in late 2012.New 11/2012: Strontium ranelate saves knees.
Entry filed under: health, health and wellness, healthy living blogs, vitamin supplements. Tags: bisphosphonates harmful, forteo, fosamax, natural osteoporosis treatments, osteoporosis and strontium, osteoporosis treatments, strontium citrate vs ranelate, strontium safety.
40 Comments Add your own
So whaddya think?
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed










1.
Vivian | June 7, 2012 at 4:23 pm
thank u for offering this infor. This is extremely important for post menopausal women, and women w/osteoporosis. I just learned of it from Dr.Oz. He mentioned nothing about Ranelate or citrate!
2.
The Savvy Sister | June 7, 2012 at 11:07 pm
So glad I could help! I guess I will have to teach Dr Oz some things eh? My oncologist loved the idea of me taking strontium and I can’t wait to see if it made a difference in my bone density test. Thanks for taking time to comment !
3.
Pat Rollins | June 8, 2012 at 3:30 pm
Thank you for your article. I too just learned about strontium from someone who saw the Dr. Oz show. I am scheduled for my second dose of Reclast in a couple of weeks and have reservations about taking those drugs. I will cancel my Reclast appointment and start taking the strontium after talking to my doctor.
4.
The Savvy Sister | June 8, 2012 at 11:38 pm
Thanks for taking the time to comment. Please discuss this in great detail with your doctor as there are many things to consider. But don’t be surprised if your doctor has never heard of strontium! Let me know what happens
5.
J Morley | August 2, 2012 at 10:31 am
Hi-
My doctor suggested that I research strontium and I am considering taking it in lieu of Boniva (my dr does not want me taking any of the usual drugs even tho I have osteoporosis). The bottle I bought does not say anything about taking on an empty stomach – just more than 2 hours before or after taking a calcium supplement. Could you please let know the rationale for taking strontium on an empty stomach? Thanks!
Jo
PS I understand that many calcium supplements should be taken with food to help with absorption (unless the supplement is food based). Would that thinking apply to strontium? Thanks again!
6.
The Savvy Sister | August 2, 2012 at 1:28 pm
The thought about taking it on an empty stomach is to insure that no absolutely no calcium foods etc are taken with it. Strontium is extremely competitive with calcium. You can certainly take it with food, but not with any dairy or almonds…high calcium foods etc. Check the labels for “added calcium”.
I actually tried taking it daily and tolerated it well for the first 3 months. Then began getting stomach upset…nothing terrible, but it was upset none the less. I am trying to take it for several days until I feel stomach problems, then I stop for several days…then back on etc. Not the best way to take it, but it’s better than nothing. I have friends that take it and don’t have any issues. I could not tolerate 2 capsules taken together. I find the stomach issues are less if I take it right before bedtime and that eliminates me having to avoid anything that might interfere as I take my calcium breakfast lunch and dinner.
Still waiting for Strontium Ranelate to be approved in this country…if the politics will allow it. It was supposed to be sometime in 2013, but I can’t find any info to see if that still will go through. There seems to be much less stomach upset with the ranelate structure added to it, but I think it’s still around 30%.
Good luck! Please tell me how things go.
7.
J Morley | August 2, 2012 at 1:40 pm
Thank you so much!
8.
Clarko | August 6, 2012 at 11:04 am
if the active ingredient in strontium ranelate and strontium citrate are the same why are the doses so different? Sc is only .680 grams while Sr is triple that at 2 grams.
9.
The Savvy Sister | August 6, 2012 at 11:52 am
The dose is 680 mg of elemental strontium from 1944mg of strontium citrate. The drug company may use the entire mg for ranelate and that’s how it’s dosed. I will try to see if I can find out how much elemental strontium is in ranelate. Thanks for your question!
10.
Clarko | August 8, 2012 at 8:26 am
oh the ‘elemental’ explanation makes sense. I have been taking 680mg of Sc for a year (have premenopause low bone density). My spine increased 6% and is now normal. Hips had only a small insignificant increase. They dont get nearly as much weight bearing exercise as the spine. My forearm is above normal density, this is from years of weighted exercise. My nails have at least tripled in density in the last year since taking Sc. Sc is doing something! I plan to keep taking it.
11.
Cam | March 14, 2013 at 1:38 pm
Clarko (below) refers to Sc (scandium). I think she means Sr (strontium).
12.
clarko | March 15, 2013 at 6:46 am
no Cam, Ive never heard of scandium. Sc refers to strontium citrate. Sr is the chemical element symbol for strontium. But its strontium citrate that is sold as an over the counter supplement.
13.
The Savvy Sister | August 8, 2012 at 11:22 am
Clarko thanks so much for sharing that information. I’m sure there are some reading that would question whether it is worth it. Thanks also for emphasizing the importance of exercise in the osteoporosis picture!
14. Strontium osteoporosis | Unidompus | August 31, 2012 at 10:09 pm
[...] Strontium for osteoporosis…if you’ve never heard of it, you will …Sep 14, 2011 … We can’t talk about strontium without first talking about osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is the thinning and weakening of bone tissue. It seems … [...]
15.
lina | September 4, 2012 at 9:02 am
i take strontioum but still have lately a fraction on L3 i do excercise twice a day
16.
The Savvy Sister | September 4, 2012 at 9:18 am
So sorry about that There are many factors that go into your risk of fracture. Good for you for exercising twice a day!
17.
Mary | October 14, 2012 at 11:14 am
Recently found out I have Osteoporosis-at 61 ya
Like others, looking for an alternative.
Tx to all forsharing
2questions:
1) pls give good strontium provider rference
2) what type of Dr is the one that does
It like biophosphates? That is all that has been offered from family doc and rhuematologist
Thanks
Mary
18.
The Savvy Sister | October 14, 2012 at 11:50 am
Hi Mary! 1) There are many on the market. The one I take is “Doctors Best Strontium Bone Maker” It’s 340 mg. One of the reasons I like this brand is that the capsules are 100% plant-based. They use cellulose for the capsule base instead of gelatin, which is animal based. I am unable to tolerate the 2 capsules/day that is the normal dosage and can only tolerate 1/day because of stomach upset. I’m sure there are other good supplement companies out there providing strontium, and I suspect you will see more.
2)Usually it’s your primary care MD that will prescribe, or a naturopth (ND). SOmetimes the promary care doc will send you to an endocrinologist(hormone doctor) if it’s a female and it’s menopause related osteoporosis.
Good luck Mary and keep searching good information to decide on the best treatment for you. It’s your body.
19.
Randi Lipkin | October 28, 2012 at 5:28 pm
Thank you for taking the time to share this info. I have been on Fosomax,and then Actonel for ten years now. I was told to stop a few years back, only to have BDT and told to go back on. I am now 60 years old, scores of 2.8 and 3.0. I am under an endocrinologist ‘s care and was just told of three choices. Be conservative and do what I have been doing,, take a drug holiday or be aggressive and start Forteo. The side effects and black box warning have me concerned. The side effects of the Actonel do as well. My friend who is a nutritionist told me to check out the mineral Strontium. That’s how I got to you. I will discuss with my regular doctor and prefer to take the drug holiday and start the Strontium.
20.
The Savvy Sister | October 28, 2012 at 6:49 pm
So glad you are researching your options when it comes to treatment. If your doctor is current on his/her research they will know of Strontium and will not be adverse to your trying it. If you do your homework, I assume you are also including vitamin D3, at least 1000 mg, with some form of Vitamin K in your diet as well to aid absorption. If you have been prescribed calcium, make it plant-based calcium like from algae as opposed to shells or stone as plant-based calciums have been proven to be better absorbed and utilized by the body. And, of course I can’t omit mentioning the importance of weight bearing exercise.
Please also keep in mind that your “scores” for risk should encompass all your risk factors for osteo (smoking history, family fracture history, steroid use, etc), not only your bone density test results.
If you have a good relationship with your doctor, and they aren’t threatened by their patients educating themselves, he/she should be on board with you giving it a try.
As mentioned, I am unable to tolerate 2 pills a day because of stomach upset. I would certainly recommend taking one a day to start out.
Good luck! I would love to know your progress!
21.
Bonnie Yagiela | October 30, 2012 at 9:05 pm
I’ve been on Strontium 680 mg for the past couple of months (Vitacost.com) to give a boost to my bone mass. I found your site doing a little more research into it. My friend (we’re both nurses) said she heard that it acts like Fosamax and will also make your bones brittle just like Fosamax. I was taking Fosamax when I broke my leg 8 years ago. I’m convinced it actually caused the bone to break. I wonder if she’s referring to Strontium ranelate version, rather than the citrate? My doctor allowed me to try it but if it’s going to cause the same problem as Fosamax, I’ll stop. He has me on Evista for bone growth since I had breast cancer in 1996 and it helps prevent cancer in the remaining breast, along with building bone. My bone mass remains on the borderline between osteopenia and osteoporosis even though I exercise and take calcium and VitD.
22.
The Savvy Sister | October 31, 2012 at 6:26 am
I have no doubt that it was the Fosamax that contributed to the break.
As far as making your bones brittle like Fosamax, that’s not what the research has found. Strontium strengthens both the out layer (compact) and inner layers (spongy) bone. Fosamax only temporarily strengthens the outer layer, leaving the inner layer weak. If you are both nurse, I assume you have broken glass ampules before. They are easy to break because even though the glass is strong, the right amount of pressure will break right through because the inside is hollow. It’s the same idea with Fosamax. The Fosamax studies use bone density to prove effectiveness
Strontuim on the other hand, strengthens both layers of bone, and the studies use bone density and bone marrow sampling to measure density, as bone density does not give an accurate reading for the inner layers of bone mass.
This is based on the studies I’ve found, and I’m assuming since there is a push to get approval here in the states, there will be more, but the politics of the pharmaceutical industry are complex.
I am always looking for new research, but I can’t read everything. If you find out anything to the contrary, please let me know.
Good luck to you and thanks for commenting!
23.
Bonnie Yagiela | October 31, 2012 at 6:34 am
Thanks for the info! Since you’re also a cancer survivor, I’m curious as to why your Doc didn’t suggest Evista? (Other than it’s expensive and hasn’t really raised my bone mass, just kept it from falling maybe).
24.
The Savvy Sister | October 31, 2012 at 6:39 am
Evista is not indicated for women who have had invasive breast cancer, just those at high risk. I had stage III. Your BC must have been in situ, right?
25.
Bonnie Yagiela | October 31, 2012 at 7:13 am
Yes, it was. I had a mastectomy and reconstruction on New Years Eve 1996 for Ductal in situ. It was listed as Stage I since there was one slide that showed it broke away from the duct and was becoming invasive in that spot. Since it covered such a large area, he didn’t feel he could do a Lumpectomy. He felt that by the time he found the margins there wouldn’t be much left of the breast anyway. I didn’t need chemo or radiation. Now, with all the new techniques, I can’t help wondering if I’d have needed the mastectomy if I had it today. Lots of new treatment these days!
26.
The Savvy Sister | October 31, 2012 at 7:17 am
Don’t ever look backward…your hurt yourself
27.
Bonnie Yagiela | October 31, 2012 at 7:19 am
Wow! You’re so right about that!
28.
Bonnie Yagiela | December 27, 2012 at 9:52 pm
I was wondering if you had your bone density done? Did the strontium make a difference? I’ve been taking it since July. I developed a “very large” synovial cyst between my L4/L5 vertebra and had to have surgery to remove it on Sept 28th. I’m developing another one on my left hand. I can’t imagine that the strontium has anything to do with it, but the thought entered my head. I was also exercising strenuously which probably injured the joints and caused the growth if the cysts. Have you heard of strontium causing issues like this?
29.
The Savvy Sister | December 28, 2012 at 9:59 am
I haven’t heard of Strontium causing anything like that. Just trying to use logic here: Synovial fluid comes from the joints, not the bone, so I can’t imagine it would affect it, but I will look into it.
I didn’t have the bone density done because (Alleluia) I can come off my aromatase inhibitor (the cause of my low numbers) in 9 months. That should improve my density, so there was no sense in doing a test now. I’ll have one done after I’ve been off for a while and then start comparing again.
Please let me know your progress and if you have some density numbers to compare.
Thanks for taking the time to comment Bonnie!
30.
Bonnie Yagiela | December 28, 2012 at 3:00 pm
I haven’t heard of stontium causing causing synovial cysts either, which is why I’m still taking it. There was some “Calcinosis”, and the MD mentioned spurs but I didn’t see this listed on the X-ray report. I just want to make sure that the extra growth in bone mass doesn’t cause irritation leading to these cysts. If you see anything in the research, let me know.
31.
The Savvy Sister | December 28, 2012 at 11:40 pm
I will Bonnie!
32.
Bill Yeager | January 31, 2013 at 7:52 am
FYI, it appears that the Citrate version is actually more efficacious (proven in rats anyway). Not that the patent owners of the Ranelate product would want us to know.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22995463
“Bone strontium levels in rats administered strontium citrate were significantly greater (p<0.05) than rats administered strontium ranelate"
33.
The Savvy Sister | January 31, 2013 at 7:57 am
Thanks for the heads up! I’m sure the ranelate suits will keep that one buried for as long as they can
34.
Bonnie Yagiela | January 31, 2013 at 2:25 pm
Hi! I’ve been taking the Strontium with dinner, no calcium supplement at that time. I wonder if it would be better to take it closer to bedtime, on an empty stomach?
35.
The Savvy Sister | January 31, 2013 at 4:24 pm
It’s worth a try. I think everyone’s system is different. I have to take it with something in my stomach, but if you can tolerate to at bedtime I say “go for it!”
36.
T. C. | February 27, 2013 at 11:49 pm
Think you are misreading some of the studies. Just clicked on the link where you said “Studies show a 31% (yes, that’s thirty-one) improvement in bone density tests* compared to a 1% loss in the control group that took a placebo.” In the study they say -
Treatment with strontium ranelate was associated with a significant 31% decrease in all clinical osteoporotic fractures (vertebral fractures included). Decrease in clinical osteoporotic fractures and bone density is NOT the same thing.
37.
The Savvy Sister | February 28, 2013 at 8:52 am
Absolutely. The umber is up to a 14% increase in bone density. Thanks very much!
38.
T. C. | February 28, 2013 at 12:00 am
Hello again- I wrote the last comment. Just want to say that I am very positive about strontium and want to give it a try – not trying to be “negative”here in anyway – just reading through all your material and found that inconsistency. Thank you for all your hard work here!
39.
The Savvy Sister | February 28, 2013 at 8:52 am
I need you on my “proofing” team
40.
T. C. | February 28, 2013 at 6:35 pm
Glad to be of help. Just trying to look at all the facts! Thanks again for having dug them out yourself for all of us.